Comments on: Second Year at OOP Conference http://www.roguewave.com/blog/second-year-at-oop-conference/ Rogue Wave's C++ blog community shares thoughts on enterprise C++ development, Rogue Wave's products, and application development challenges. Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:46:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: Scott Lasica http://www.roguewave.com/blog/second-year-at-oop-conference/#comment-201 Scott Lasica Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:24:05 +0000 http://www.roguewave.com/blog/second-year-at-oop-conference/#comment-201 Hi Matt, sorry for the VERY late reply. I didn't realize that you had left a comment. We haven't tested up to 20 GB, but have tested a 4 GB file. HydraSDO scaled linearly with both memory footprint as well as performance up to 4 GB. Most people we speak with use files under 1 GB in size, and in fact there was only the one situation where someone had a 4 GB file. Are you seeing usage of XML with sizes greater than 1 GB? Hi Matt, sorry for the VERY late reply. I didn’t realize that you had left a comment. We haven’t tested up to 20 GB, but have tested a 4 GB file. HydraSDO scaled linearly with both memory footprint as well as performance up to 4 GB.

Most people we speak with use files under 1 GB in size, and in fact there was only the one situation where someone had a 4 GB file. Are you seeing usage of XML with sizes greater than 1 GB?

]]> By: Matt http://www.roguewave.com/blog/second-year-at-oop-conference/#comment-111 Matt Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:02:07 +0000 http://www.roguewave.com/blog/second-year-at-oop-conference/#comment-111 Interesting post on the large XML file processing. I have been looking at the Intel XML Software Suite solution and they claim to support up to 20GB files. How does the Roguewave solution compare? see http://www.intel.com/software/xml Interesting post on the large XML file processing. I have been looking at the Intel XML Software Suite solution and they claim to support up to 20GB files. How does the Roguewave solution compare?

see http://www.intel.com/software/xml

]]>